[alexpham14]

I appreciate how it redefines “small” not by parameter count but by practical impact and deployability.

[lblume]

I do not — parameter count is objective, practical impact depends on such a multitude of factors that any comparison becomes virtually meaningless.

[kergonath]

The standard for parameters count is rapidly evolving. Something large now will be small tomorrow, there is no point in using such a moving target as a criterion.