top | item 44098501

(no title)

fanwood | 9 months ago

Not really, it's just that rich people are mostly above the law most of the time

discuss

order

anovikov|9 months ago

When it comes to criminal offences, they are pretty much within the law, well except they can afford better lawyers so usually get away with minimum legally possible punishment.

Companies and the concept of limited liability exists to make innovation possible. No one will start a startup knowing they will have their house confiscated and go to prison if it fails. And, because majority of money businessmen make is the stock worth, company being insolvent and thus it's stock losing all value is in itself a punishment heavy enough for the founders.

lucianbr|9 months ago

> No one will start a startup knowing they will have their house confiscated and go to prison if it fails.

What does that have to do with anything? We're not discussing a case of VW making bad business decisions and losing money.

If you start a company and break the law and harm people, you should have your house confiscated and/or go to prison. If you can't take this responsibility, just don't start the startup, that's perfect.

You are creating confusion about the subject being discussed in order to defend criminals.

nemonemo|9 months ago

We need to balance the benefit and the downside of the limited liability in corporations. If innovation no longer becomes beneficial for the society and only beneficial for a small number of people, perhaps the society may need to reconsider the concept.

thatguy0900|9 months ago

Why would you go to jail unless you're doing something illegal? Are you honestly saying startups should be legally exempt from pollution laws and allowed to cheat brazenly on commissions tests by public agencies? It's fair for rich people to just lose some income(and still be rich) for crimes while poor people have to go to jail is honestly a unhinged take

FirmwareBurner|9 months ago

Rich people are above the law precisely because they use corporations and corporate laws as shields to deflect personal liability of their actions as a actions of "the company" which is a faceless entity.

"You see, I didn't steal your money, the company I ran stole your money, but that's actually on you because you didn't read the fine print I put in the contract you signed. And don't worry, justice was served, the company got punished and is now insolvent. Now watch this drive *swings golf club*"

wat10000|9 months ago

It’s worse than that. Rich-people crimes are often codified as much less severe than regular-people crimes, or are just outright legal.

This is a great example. Why is this emissions fakery illegal? Ultimately it’s because pollution kills people. Are these people going to prison for killing people? Not exactly. They’re going to prison for killing too many people. If they had stayed within the limits, they’d still be killing people, just not as many, and it would be 100% legal.

Stab a person in the lungs, go to jail. Kill people by putting toxins into their lungs, well, just stay under this limit.

Walk out the door with a $10 item you didn’t pay for, crime. Fail to pay your worker $1,000 that they earned, that’s a civil matter. Worst case you’ll have to pay a penalty.

lb1lf|9 months ago

“Corporations have neither bodies to be punished, nor souls to be condemned, they therefore do as they like.”

Edward, Lord Thurlow c.1850

lurk2|9 months ago

> I didn't steal your money, the company I ran stole your money

This isn’t how it works.