Nope, not yet. I tried that 3 times, once for my mac, then for my linux and once for a project. Every time I gave it a solid try found it lacking so I made a note to wait a few more years. The promise of reproducible systems is so hard to resist but nix brings crazy complexity (not all of it necessary), I'd prefer a system where their package repo has 4 packages but it makes it easy enough to me to bring other packages.Writing nix is like writing functions but in order to remember the arguments and fields of those arguments in another file that you can only access through your browser. Look at any nix file, and tell me where each variable is coming from.
ThatMedicIsASpy|9 months ago
I've moved to Atomic desktops and can't name anything I am missing. For dev stuff there are containers.
pxc|9 months ago
Flakes is an "experimental feature" of Nix itself, but it has shipped in stable releases of Nix for years now. There was a time when you had to build an unreleased version of Nix to play with flakes but that was a long time ago.
Whether you use a rolling release for the package set, e.g., nixos-unstable or nixpkgs-unstable, is orthogonal to whether or not you use flakes.
Fwiw, I generally prefer to run the unstable branches of Nixpkgs. Occasionally you hit something you have an opportunity to fix yourself, but that's not very frequent these days, even on the unstable branches.
IshKebab|9 months ago
If it was a function call you could just go-to-definition.
Environment variables have a similar issue. It's often hard to know what they do because they could be used by basically anything at any time.
sureglymop|9 months ago
I am trying to create a tool to help see exactly where and by which program any environment variable was set/exported since boot.
This is still in the conceptual phase but I'm looking into linux' ftrace to achieve this. Any ideas or pointers are welcome.
snapplebobapple|9 months ago