top | item 44110879 (no title) RetroTechie | 9 months ago Author didn't name source of an image in the article: ("Dependency")https://xkcd.com/2347/Uncool. discuss order hn newest thunderbong|9 months ago Mobile versionhttps://m.xkcd.com/2347/ AStonesThrow|9 months ago https://xkcd.com/license.htmlRandall's license text is really chill; normally to give attribution to an image from Commons there would be more to do, but currently the article does hotlink to the page on Xkcd.com, and that is clearly "stated in the LICENSE file". RetroTechie|9 months ago Ah you're correct. I text-searched article for "xkcd" & that came up empty. But I missed that image is a link.s/uncool/okay/
AStonesThrow|9 months ago https://xkcd.com/license.htmlRandall's license text is really chill; normally to give attribution to an image from Commons there would be more to do, but currently the article does hotlink to the page on Xkcd.com, and that is clearly "stated in the LICENSE file". RetroTechie|9 months ago Ah you're correct. I text-searched article for "xkcd" & that came up empty. But I missed that image is a link.s/uncool/okay/
RetroTechie|9 months ago Ah you're correct. I text-searched article for "xkcd" & that came up empty. But I missed that image is a link.s/uncool/okay/
thunderbong|9 months ago
https://m.xkcd.com/2347/
AStonesThrow|9 months ago
Randall's license text is really chill; normally to give attribution to an image from Commons there would be more to do, but currently the article does hotlink to the page on Xkcd.com, and that is clearly "stated in the LICENSE file".
RetroTechie|9 months ago
s/uncool/okay/