The Courts have broad leeway over document retention in a legal proceeding. The fact the documents are bring retained doesn't immediately imply plaintiffs get to see all of them.
There are myriad ways courts balance privacy and legal-interest concerns.
(The Times et al are alleging that OpenAI is aiding copyright violation by letting people get the text of news stories from the AI).
If people can get the text itself from AI, then anyone can then why would it need access to other people's data?
Does the Times believe that other people can get this text while it can't get it itself? To prove that the AI is stealing the info, Times does not need access to people's logs. All it has to show is that it can get that text.
This sounds like Citizen United again to AstroTurf and gets access to logs with a fake cause.
shadowgovt|9 months ago
There are myriad ways courts balance privacy and legal-interest concerns.
(The Times et al are alleging that OpenAI is aiding copyright violation by letting people get the text of news stories from the AI).
MeIam|8 months ago
Does the Times believe that other people can get this text while it can't get it itself? To prove that the AI is stealing the info, Times does not need access to people's logs. All it has to show is that it can get that text.
This sounds like Citizen United again to AstroTurf and gets access to logs with a fake cause.