[MeIam]

Time does not need user logs to prove such a thing if it was true. Times can show that it is possible so they can show how their own users can access the text. Why would they need other user's data?

[KaiserPro]

> Time does not need user logs to prove such a thing if it was true.

No it needs to show how often it happens to prove a point of how much impact its had.

[MeIam]

Why would that matter, if people didn't use it as much, does it mean that it doesn't matter if there were few people?

[mandevil]

For the most part (there are a few exceptions), in the US lawsuits are not based on "possible" harm but actual observed harm. To show that, you need actual observed user behavior.

[dragonwriter]

> Times can show that it is possible

The allegation is not that merely that infringement is possible; the actual occurrence and scale are relevant to the case.