top | item 44191490 (no title) MeIam | 9 months ago Why would that matter, if people didn't use it as much, does it mean that it doesn't matter if there were few people? discuss order hn newest dragonwriter|9 months ago > Why would that matterBecause its a copyright infringement case, so existence and the scale of the infringement is relevant to both whether there is liability and, if so, how much; the issue isn't that it is possible for infringement to occur. delusional|9 months ago You have to argue damages. It actually has to have cost NYT some money, and for that you need to know some extent. MeIam|9 months ago We don't even know if Times uses AI to get information from other sources either. They can get a hint of news and then produce their material. load replies (4)
dragonwriter|9 months ago > Why would that matterBecause its a copyright infringement case, so existence and the scale of the infringement is relevant to both whether there is liability and, if so, how much; the issue isn't that it is possible for infringement to occur.
delusional|9 months ago You have to argue damages. It actually has to have cost NYT some money, and for that you need to know some extent. MeIam|9 months ago We don't even know if Times uses AI to get information from other sources either. They can get a hint of news and then produce their material. load replies (4)
MeIam|9 months ago We don't even know if Times uses AI to get information from other sources either. They can get a hint of news and then produce their material. load replies (4)
dragonwriter|9 months ago
Because its a copyright infringement case, so existence and the scale of the infringement is relevant to both whether there is liability and, if so, how much; the issue isn't that it is possible for infringement to occur.
delusional|9 months ago
MeIam|9 months ago