top | item 44192459 (no title) jackstraw14 | 8 months ago The link in OP was from April 29th, here is the author's most recent post almost a month later: https://fullydoxxed.com/fuck-chat-gpt-really-is-ruining-writ... discuss order hn newest cnunciato|8 months ago > It’s a linguistic uncanny valley, close enough to human to be recognizable, but different enough to be repulsive.I love this. It's exactly how I feel when I read AI-generated content. A little bit sick, not really sure why. nilirl|8 months ago No, passing an inverse-turing test while writing can't be the goal.The onus is on the reader to accept an argument; irrespective of source.Writing, of any sort, can no longer be used as proof of 'written entirely by human'.
cnunciato|8 months ago > It’s a linguistic uncanny valley, close enough to human to be recognizable, but different enough to be repulsive.I love this. It's exactly how I feel when I read AI-generated content. A little bit sick, not really sure why.
nilirl|8 months ago No, passing an inverse-turing test while writing can't be the goal.The onus is on the reader to accept an argument; irrespective of source.Writing, of any sort, can no longer be used as proof of 'written entirely by human'.
cnunciato|8 months ago
I love this. It's exactly how I feel when I read AI-generated content. A little bit sick, not really sure why.
nilirl|8 months ago
The onus is on the reader to accept an argument; irrespective of source.
Writing, of any sort, can no longer be used as proof of 'written entirely by human'.