top | item 44201267

JavaScript await was rogue rogue along

9 points| 66yatman | 8 months ago |codedynasty.dev

8 comments

order

Dylan16807|8 months ago

So are we going to define the word "rogue" here?

"uses duck typing"?

rendall|8 months ago

So we're all just going to ignore the fact that the title says rogue rogue?

Dylan16807|8 months ago

I almost mentioned it but the article page doesn't have that typo in the title and I'm too busy asking for clarification about the text.

bung|8 months ago

I'm really sorry this is my contribution/comment atm, I'm very interested in this stuff, but I am having a hell of a time reading this. Even if you keep the font I can't figure if some increased letter-spacing would help, really though I need some line-spacing and paragraph margin bottom for the love of god it's a contrasty text wall blur and I can't focus :( I'm getting old I guess, coding since the late 90s, and here we are finally the point my optometrist warned me about that I'll need glasses soon lol

chihuahua|8 months ago

Not just the formatting, but also - why does it start with this sentence:

> Don’t tell me you don’t know await is rogue too, jess christ.

What is that supposed to mean? "rogue"? "rogue too"? "await" is rogue, but something else is also rogue - what is that something else?

"Jess Christ" - why is the author (apparently?) exasperated at the very start of this page?

Why does someone write like this? Apparently not with the goal of being understood.

mediumsmart|8 months ago

I know it’s rogue when it fails . . . await for it. . jslint.com