top | item 44210652

(no title)

ddoeth | 8 months ago

In 2021 there were 51 Million tons of plastic waste produced in the US [0], which is about 150kg per person.

Burning that is creating between 264 and 750kg of CO2 per person and year, definitely not insignificant.

I'm not saying that big corporations are not responsible for a huge chunk of the emissions, but getting away from using so much plastic is not hurting.

[0]: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1339439/plastic-waste-ma...

discuss

order

toast0|8 months ago

If it's used to generate electricity or usable heat and not only to get rid of it, plastic would substitute for another fuel, so it's not as simple as looking at co2 from burning plastic vs co2 from dumping it in landfill.

I don't have numbers, but if burning plastic replaces some coal or fracked natural gas, that could be a win, all things considered.

tsimionescu|8 months ago

Burning plastic is both dirtier and less efficient than burning at least oil and natural gas. So you will actually pollute more (both CO2 and various other byproducts) by burning plastic than by burning oil and methane to get the same amount of energy out.

Not to mention, to get usable energy out of the plastic, you have to invest lots of energy for recycling it first - you need infrastructure and education to collect it separately from other trash, you need additional processing to sort it by type, to clean it of many other residue, etc.

And evwn if you do all that fairly efficiently, you're still never going to collect a large percentage of the plastic people use. So any extra environmental impact from plastic in landfills will still be there and need to be resolved.

BurningFrog|8 months ago

I don't doubt your numbers, but we are (or at least I am) talking about plastic bags.

I would guess they are less than 1 of those 150kg/year.

> Burning that is creating between 264 and 750kg of CO2 per person and year, definitely not insignificant.

Grok says total US CO2 emissions are "approximately 13.83 metric tons per person". I agree that 750kg (0.75 ton) is significant, but I don't thing plastic bags even affect the last decimal of that number.

tsimionescu|8 months ago

Why would we discuss plastic bags exclusively? Singling out one item like this makes little sense - the problem is the aggregate of all plastic we use, not specifically one item. If we only used plastic for our shopping bags, we wouldn't be having this discussion at all.

Tronno|8 months ago

How can burning 150 kg of mass create 750 kg of mass?

jmb99|8 months ago

The oxygen is not contained in the 150kg of plastic, it’s pulled out of the atmosphere. You’re actually “burning” substantially more than 150kg if you include all the reactants.

bornfreddy|8 months ago

Burning takes oxygen from the air so it makes sense that the released mass would be higher. Every 12g of C is tied to 32g of O to get CO2. However I would expect the number to be around 500kg (quick calculation) max.

kolinko|8 months ago

Otoh, if our emissions would be only 1 ton per person per capita, it would bring us close to paris agreement goals.

Also, scrubbing 1 ton co2 is around $600 with current tech if I’m not mistaken.