(no title)
ddoeth | 8 months ago
Burning that is creating between 264 and 750kg of CO2 per person and year, definitely not insignificant.
I'm not saying that big corporations are not responsible for a huge chunk of the emissions, but getting away from using so much plastic is not hurting.
[0]: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1339439/plastic-waste-ma...
toast0|8 months ago
I don't have numbers, but if burning plastic replaces some coal or fracked natural gas, that could be a win, all things considered.
tsimionescu|8 months ago
Not to mention, to get usable energy out of the plastic, you have to invest lots of energy for recycling it first - you need infrastructure and education to collect it separately from other trash, you need additional processing to sort it by type, to clean it of many other residue, etc.
And evwn if you do all that fairly efficiently, you're still never going to collect a large percentage of the plastic people use. So any extra environmental impact from plastic in landfills will still be there and need to be resolved.
BurningFrog|8 months ago
I would guess they are less than 1 of those 150kg/year.
> Burning that is creating between 264 and 750kg of CO2 per person and year, definitely not insignificant.
Grok says total US CO2 emissions are "approximately 13.83 metric tons per person". I agree that 750kg (0.75 ton) is significant, but I don't thing plastic bags even affect the last decimal of that number.
tsimionescu|8 months ago
Tronno|8 months ago
jmb99|8 months ago
bornfreddy|8 months ago
kolinko|8 months ago
Also, scrubbing 1 ton co2 is around $600 with current tech if I’m not mistaken.