top | item 44217663

Air-dried vs. Kiln-dried Wood

159 points| crescit_eundo | 9 months ago |christopherschwarz.substack.com | reply

82 comments

order
[+] HPsquared|9 months ago|reply
Wood expands and contracts with moisture content. More moisture makes the fibers "fatten up".

The interesting thing is that this is anisotropic: the expansion/contraction occurs across the grain, NOT along the grain. The rate of expansion also depends on the local characteristics of the grain itself (hence the effects of warping due to uneven expansion) ... Also there's a big difference between the direction "across the growth rings" (i.e. radially when it was still a tree) and tangentially to the growth rings. And these surfaces are curved, of course. But one thing we can always say is: the wood doesn't significantly change size along the grain.

Design and construction methods can make wooden artifacts more or less susceptible to cracking and distortion from this. For example dovetail joints can be pretty good as all the wood expands/contacts together the same way. Especially if the pieces are joined together from the same piece of wood. Stuff like that. Or at the other extreme, metal fixings like nails don't move with moisture at all, which can cause problems with relative movement and stress can accumulate.

Edit: and the repeated cycling of moisture content induced stress can eventually lead to cracking, in a similar way to metal fatigue. Old wood just cracks sometimes, this is probably why.

[+] exDM69|9 months ago|reply
A good mental model for wood is that trees are a bunch of stacked cones (growth rings) on top of each other.

In the spring it fills with water and the diameter grows but the tree does not get longer because it needs to support a large mass on top and the lengthwise fibers are not able to grow and shrink (they need to be stiff to carry the weight).

Because of this, the circumference of the outermost growth rings need to grow more than the inner ones.

Now cut a board out of it and look at the end grain. Think what happens when the rings closer to the outside need to shrink more than the inner ones for the same humidity change. For a flat sawn board, you will always see it cup so that the concave side is on the outside.

This doesn't explain why boards twist or bow but cupping is the most prevalent wood movement in typical flat sawn boards.

[+] rollulus|9 months ago|reply
I’ve been taught that in the length it can expand/contract at most 1%, but in the width at most 10%.

This is also why properly designed tabletops are attached to the frame with a “floating” construction that can handle those changes.

[+] rags2riches|9 months ago|reply
A panel door is basically designed to minimize warping as the wood expands and contracts. There is leeway for the panels to move inside the edge pieces (sorry, not sure about the terminology here) and the edge pieces have the grain along the sides of the door. Stuck doors or doors that will not close are no fun.
[+] arturocamembert|9 months ago|reply
Small addendum: some traditional wooden joinery is deliberately prepared to account for the varying rates and effects of drying across the timber.

This is particularly relevant in timberframing, where you want to work with the wood when it is as green as possible. Green pine, though heavier to lug around, is significantly more receptive to a chisel than drier lumber. In a classic mortise and tenon joint [0], it's common to leave the outer edge of the shoulder slightly raised from the inner edge to account for the natural warping as the exterior of the beam dries more aggressively.

Although it's more outside my area of experience, I believe fine carpentry also has a few techniques that see a higher frequency of use in areas that enjoy seasonal swings in humidity. The split-tenon is the only one that comes to mind, but, now that I think of it, I realize my mental model isn't great. More surface area to account for seasonal swelling / shrinkage? Maybe someone else can chime with a better explanation of this one.

[0] https://www.barnyard.com/sites/default/files/styles/full_pag...

[+] gertrunde|9 months ago|reply
For some reason this reminds me of :

https://www.thefenlandblackoakproject.co.uk/our-story

In particular - the section on drying - air drying would have been too rapid/harmful to the wood - so they put it into a purpose-built dehumidifying kiln for 9 months.

(It was briefly discussed here a few years ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36912861 )

[+] kulahan|9 months ago|reply
I saw a thing once where a guy would make 3 large cuts at the bottom of a tree, in a particular pattern. This would kill the tree, and it would essentially air-dry over the course of a year or two. I wonder how that compares.

I should note he was a homesteader doing this to provide dry wood with easy access during cold months.

[+] jimnotgym|9 months ago|reply
I used to be a carpenter and joiner. I once had a batch that was badly kiln dried. We called it 'case hardening', I guess it was done too fast. If you planed a flat face on it and it instantly warped again!

If you sawed it, it would either pinch or spring apart. I made the sales rep come and see it.

[+] cmrdporcupine|9 months ago|reply
Had some poplar milled from some large trees we had to take down here. Air dried in my shop for 4 years before having it made into a table. All it took was 1 winter and it split and bent severely inside the house. I will only kiln dry from now on.
[+] exDM69|9 months ago|reply
4 years is more than enough time for drying. Rule of thumb is year per inch of thickness.

I'm just speculating here but probably the support structure didn't allow for wood movement. You need something to keep the table top flat while allowing it to move. Screwing it to a stiff frame (steel or cross grain wodo) is certain to crack when the wood moves.

Breadboard ends, sliding dovetails or steel support with elongated holes (going to a threaded insert and bolt) are good ways to support a table top.

The wood was probably stabilized to your shop atmosphere but indoors in the dry winter, maybe with air conditioning or a fire place, and there's going to be movement.

Kiln drying does not stop seasonal wood movement.

If you share a picture we can take an educated guess what caused the table to warp and crack.

[+] zitsarethecure|9 months ago|reply
Four years of air drying may not have been enough, depending on the thickness of the boards and the moisture level in the air. Also the issues of wood movement and grain direction must be considered during the design and manufacturing of furniture with that wood. Home sawn wood will often have knots, randomly curved grain, etc, so it can be more difficult to get predictable results.
[+] sarchertech|9 months ago|reply
I’ve never dried anything that long indoors, but from what people told me when I was researching the best way to dry some red oak I had milled there are issues drying indoors doors. Wind does most of the drying outside.

Did you use a moisture meter?

[+] jws|9 months ago|reply
I dried three red oak trees using a dehumidifier kiln. ( 4'x4'x16' 1" pink insulation foam box assembled with packing tape with a household dehumidifier and fan inside. Very low tech. Knock it down when not using it.)

The process is mostly: measure moisture content of wood, pick a humidity to maintain, check wood periodically to see if it is drying too fast or too slow. Weigh water coming out to monitor process.

Very low effort if you have space to allocate while in use. The wood came out well, no complaints.

One downside is you won't kill insects with heat, so you could have trouble if it is buggy wood.

[+] epgui|9 months ago|reply
4 years is actually not that much for a passive air drying process.
[+] CallMeJim|9 months ago|reply
Poplar is a very wet wood. It tends to take so long to dry, and then burns so quickly, that it isn't worth processing for firewood!
[+] JamesSwift|9 months ago|reply
What was the moisture % at the end, and what was the joinery of the end product?
[+] lukaslalinsky|9 months ago|reply
What a shame this is a paywalled article. The first part was interesting, but I'm definitely not going to subscribe. If I could pay for this one article, I would.
[+] coldpie|9 months ago|reply
I don't subscribe to his paid blogs personally, but Chris Schwarz is one of the best known writers in the woodworking world. I own most of his books, and I wouldn't be a woodworker today if it weren't for his writing. If you like this one article, odds are good you'll enjoy more from him, at least enough to pay for a month subscription or something.

Edit: though now I see this particular article was actually written by their editor/researcher, not Chris, so uh nevermind, maybe.

[+] Gys|9 months ago|reply
I could read the full article without problems. Using MacOS/Firefox. Maybe just clear your cookies.
[+] hn8726|9 months ago|reply
And the non-paywalled part doesn't even get into the differences between air-dried and kiln-dried wood.
[+] pavel_lishin|9 months ago|reply
> “But if you want softwoods to manufacture windows, doors, furniture and things like that, the continuous process is not the one to go with,” Avramidis says. “You have to go back to the batch process. Why? Because you cannot have stress relief in the continuous process. And, of course, hardwoods should be dried in boxes only.”

Aha, yes, of course.

(I have no idea what stress relief means here, or why hardwoods are different :/)

[+] jandrese|9 months ago|reply
The article talks about stress relief when it went down the rabbit hole of tiny mom & pop mills who were turning their kilns off every night because they didn't have a third shift and later discovering that turning them off periodically produces better lumber because it allows the wood to relieve stress and suffer less distortion.

However, the continuous process is basically just a slow moving conveyor belt where you are constantly feeding green wood in one end and dried lumber is constantly being spit out of the far end. I don't see why you couldn't incorporate ambient air chambers in strategic places on the belt to destress the lumber, at the cost of making the entire production line somewhat longer.

[+] nemo44x|9 months ago|reply
If you want to smoke food (BBQ, etc) avoid kiln dried wood. It's too dry. You want dry wood but you generally want some level of moisture (15%-20% is often good, more in some other styles) in most of your wood.
[+] sejje|9 months ago|reply
Many folks soak the chips in bowls of water
[+] kragen|9 months ago|reply
> In 2019, near a river basin above Kalambo Falls in Zambia, archeologists discovered “two interlocking logs joined transversely by an intentionally cut notch,” according to a 2023 article in Nature. Using luminescence, the archeologists estimated this rare find was 476,000 years old.

Holy shit.

It is too bad that the post cuts off in the middle with a paywall notice. We really should ban such links. They aren't conducive to high-quality discussion.

[+] LunaSea|9 months ago|reply
I wonder how they could differentiate the age of the wood from the age of the construction
[+] xhkkffbf|9 months ago|reply
Anyone have any experience drying the wood in a vacuum chamber?
[+] jollyllama|9 months ago|reply
Didn't read the paywalled bit but the gist of air-dried being nice to work with makes sense. But you want kiln-dried for your stove! Or so I'm told.