(no title)
MengYuanLong | 13 years ago
Further, a bike that costs less than $200 is certainly not a bike I would buy for commuting. Having commuted without a car for over three years, I can assure you that steel frames are not your friend and arguably not practical if you want to enjoy your lifestyle.
jbl|13 years ago
Steel rides great. Cheap steel will weigh more than cheap aluminum, but is not that much heavier once you factor in yourself and what you carry.
The nice thing about steel is that it's repairable, rides nicely, and fails gracefully (should it fail at all).
mikestew|13 years ago
Speaking as one who spent $3500 on a steel-framed commuting/winter training bike, I obviously disagree. Aluminum rides rough and carbon is just silly on a commuter.
Though to give you the benefit of the doubt, you did mention "<$200". I think that's more the issue than what the frame is made of.
anamax|13 years ago
Huh? The "chain loss" is the same during power. There's some friction loss when you're not pedaling a "not fixie" but there's also a "friction loss" in your legs when you're spinning just to keep a fixie's wheels turning.
> Second, you can often make a cheap fixie by finding an old frame, refurbishing it, and replacing the rear hub.
A coaster hub isn't that much more expensive and the user-experience is much better for most people. (That said, a coaster hub with some gears is reasonably cheap.)
And, replacing a hub is work (or expensive). It's often easier/cheaper to just find a rear wheel.
mfringel|13 years ago
bencpeters|13 years ago
The ride of a decent steel bike is much softer (less harsh) than an aluminum bike. An old steel 10 speed with tension shifters (less fiddly/adjustment prone) is my idea of a perfect commuter bike...
unknown|13 years ago
[deleted]
marklabedz|13 years ago
chrisrhoden|13 years ago
Swizec|13 years ago
However, I'd love to try riding a fixie some time. It sounds interesting.