You can’t judge battery life and performance off a .0 release when the priority is on delivering features with the minimum number of showstopper bugs. At least wait until the .1.
It has been like this for every Apple release for over 20 years.
Maybe for "Apple", but there's one team that takes performance seriously. The WebKit team has a zero tolerance policy for performance regressions (https://webkit.org/performance/) dating back to the implementation of the Page Load Test in 2002 (Creative Selection, p. 93).
WebKit sounds like the kind of scrappy startup Apple might want to acquire and gain some hard-earned engineering knowledge.
If Apple has been shipping betas for 2 decades that do not meaningfully prepare the release candidate for users, something is horribly wrong. They're either not listening to the feedback they receive or they're not giving themselves enough time; both are firmly within Apple's control.
Well, firstly, this is a developer beta. So the target audience are developers that want to get a head start on getting their app(s) ready. So measuring battery performance of those dev betas is dumb.
Also, they do listen to feedback and do gather it. They won't change entire design language now tho.
tl|8 months ago
WebKit sounds like the kind of scrappy startup Apple might want to acquire and gain some hard-earned engineering knowledge.
coldtea|8 months ago
But apparently they still welcome app-crashing bugs and UI-stalling code!
MokaAkashiya|8 months ago
bigyabai|8 months ago
0x457|8 months ago
Also, they do listen to feedback and do gather it. They won't change entire design language now tho.
TylerE|8 months ago
exe34|8 months ago
Screwing with the battery life on a mobile device would be a showstopper bug if Steve were still around.
rideontime|8 months ago