top | item 44233117 (no title) mdeeks | 8 months ago Doesn't this study say that it had a very low impact?> they led to a permanent reduction of approximately 8,000 births in the same year, and 145,000 fewer births since 1980 discuss order hn newest alexey-salmin|8 months ago The paper also estimates the number of children saved at 57 per year, so the safety impact is even lower morsch|8 months ago Let's call it 80 and you get a rate of 1:100 children saved per children not conceived. What would be a reasonable rate in your mind? load replies (2)
alexey-salmin|8 months ago The paper also estimates the number of children saved at 57 per year, so the safety impact is even lower morsch|8 months ago Let's call it 80 and you get a rate of 1:100 children saved per children not conceived. What would be a reasonable rate in your mind? load replies (2)
morsch|8 months ago Let's call it 80 and you get a rate of 1:100 children saved per children not conceived. What would be a reasonable rate in your mind? load replies (2)
alexey-salmin|8 months ago
morsch|8 months ago