[hash872]

Seems like a non-sequitur. 'Corruption' is typically not an issue in civil disputes. 'Influence peddling' and 'political horse trading' are not the subject of civil litigation. If you think 'corruption' is influencing judicial remedies- it's certainly a lot easier to bribe a juror than an appointed judge.

Most developed countries using a panel of judges to hear civil disputes score better than the US on corruption indicators, not worse

[MichaelZuo]

A panel even of just 3 judges seems a lot more expensive to operate than 1 judge and a dozen jurors?