[sureokbutyeah]

Work accurately? Relative to what? Old humans? Make up something about psychology? Physics? Economics? History? Academics have been doing that for years and we all blindly agreed their work was accurate, lauded them, then found out decades later it was garbage.

Seems typical for humans; centuries of false belief religion was accurate, now contemporary nation state politics, economics, and the engineered things they sell for profit.

So long as enough stuff is available on shelves to keep people sedate, they'll believe whatever. Our biology couples us to knowing when we need food, water; keep those normal and no one cares about anything else. Riots only occur when biology is threatened. Everything else about humanity is 100% made up false belief, appeals to empty trust in what we say.

Physics makes it pretty clear its all just skins suits pulling illusions out their ass all the way down. We can never change the immutable forces of physics, there's too much other stuff in universe rushing in to correct. This is it for humans; idle about on Earth hallucinating.

[jay_kyburz]

I can agree on Psychology, Economics, and History, but most of Physics is reproducible science.

I think, now more than ever, we need to clearly distinguish reproducible science from untested hypothesise. Reality vs Opinion.

update: opinion is not quite the right word here. Perhaps somebody else can think of a better word.

[sarchertech]

So if you’re reading a summary of a bullshit document written by an old human, created by a machine trained on billions of bullshit documents written by old humans, what do you get out of that?