top | item 44248806

(no title)

pnutjam | 8 months ago

The quality of any individual part of the code might be better, but the architecture is way worse and unsustainable long term.

discuss

order

cogman10|8 months ago

Yes. However, frankly, BSers weren't maintaining a good architecture anyways (in my experience). Code simply landed where it could rather than addressing the overarching problem.

It's why code reviews remain important.

lipowitz|8 months ago

A BSer is about pushing for things that don't make sense but sound like they solve more constraints than anything possible to implement could. It is very unlikely they are giving you code that could compile. (Though if so there's a little bug or todo in it that just happens to be Turing award's material.)