[sundar_p]

I wonder if not exercising code writing will atrophy this ability. Similarly to how the ability to read a book does not necessarily imply the ability to write a book.

I find that I understand and am more opinionated about code when I personally write it; conversely, I am more lenient/less careful when reviewing someone else's work.

[a_tyshchenko]

I can relate to this. In my experience, my brain has already started resisting writing code manually — it increasingly “waits” for GPT to suggest a full solution. I even get annoyed when the answer isn’t right on the first try.

That said, I can’t deny that my coding speed has multiplied. Since I started using GPT, I’ve completely stopped relying on junior assistants. Some tasks are now easier to solve directly with GPT, skipping specs and manual reviews entirely.

[danielbln]

To drag out the trite comparison once more: not writing assembly will atrophy your skill to write assembly, yet the vast majority of us is perfectly happy handing this work to a compiler. I know, this analogy has issues (deterministic vs stochastic, etc.) but the code remains true: you might lose that particular skill, but it might not matter as you slide on up the abstraction latter.

[sundar_p]

Not writing assembly may atrophy your ability to read assembly is my point. We still have to reason about the output of these code generators until/if they become bulletproof.