[avsteele]

This doesn't rebut anything from the best critique of the Apple paper.

https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.09250

[Jabbles]

Those are points (2) and (5).

[foldr]

It does rebut point (1) of the abstract. Perhaps not convincingly, in your view, but it does directly addresses this kind of response.

[avsteele]

Papers make specific conclusions based on specific data. The paper I linked specifically rebuts the conclusions of the paper. Gary makes vague statements that could be interpreted as being related.

It is scientific malpractice to write a post supposedly rebutting responses to a paper and not directly address the most salient one.

[spookie]

A paper citing arxiv papers and x.com doesn't pass my smell test tbh