top | item 44282310 (no title) folli | 8 months ago Tangentially related: I'm trying to make LiDAR data in Switzerland more accessible, see https://github.com/r-follador/delta-reliefThere's some interesting examples in the Readme. discuss order hn newest westurner|8 months ago Does LIDAR work underwater?FWIU in Grand Traverse Bay, Lake Michigan, there's a 9,000 year old stonehenge-like structure 40 feet underwater; that's 4000 thousand years older than Stonehenge and about 6000 years older than the Osireoin and the Pyramids./? Michigan underwater stonehenge: https://www.google.com/search?q=michigan+underwater+stonehen...There's not even a name or a wikipedia page for the site? There are various presumed Clovis sites which are now underwater in TN, as well. Antipode|8 months ago A lot of the pictures used in articles for this are pictures of something else (possible an old ship). Here's what it actually looks like: https://holleyarchaeology.com/index.php/the-truth-about-the-...Calling it Stonehenge-like is a real stretch. load replies (1) thfuran|8 months ago Bathymetric lidar exists, but it's a lot more common for there to be enough particulates in water to mess it up than for air. 38|8 months ago How is this related at all? TacticalCoder|8 months ago TFA literally says archaeologists discovered the crop(s) using LIDAR and GP links to a project using LIDAR to map lands.
westurner|8 months ago Does LIDAR work underwater?FWIU in Grand Traverse Bay, Lake Michigan, there's a 9,000 year old stonehenge-like structure 40 feet underwater; that's 4000 thousand years older than Stonehenge and about 6000 years older than the Osireoin and the Pyramids./? Michigan underwater stonehenge: https://www.google.com/search?q=michigan+underwater+stonehen...There's not even a name or a wikipedia page for the site? There are various presumed Clovis sites which are now underwater in TN, as well. Antipode|8 months ago A lot of the pictures used in articles for this are pictures of something else (possible an old ship). Here's what it actually looks like: https://holleyarchaeology.com/index.php/the-truth-about-the-...Calling it Stonehenge-like is a real stretch. load replies (1) thfuran|8 months ago Bathymetric lidar exists, but it's a lot more common for there to be enough particulates in water to mess it up than for air.
Antipode|8 months ago A lot of the pictures used in articles for this are pictures of something else (possible an old ship). Here's what it actually looks like: https://holleyarchaeology.com/index.php/the-truth-about-the-...Calling it Stonehenge-like is a real stretch. load replies (1)
thfuran|8 months ago Bathymetric lidar exists, but it's a lot more common for there to be enough particulates in water to mess it up than for air.
38|8 months ago How is this related at all? TacticalCoder|8 months ago TFA literally says archaeologists discovered the crop(s) using LIDAR and GP links to a project using LIDAR to map lands.
TacticalCoder|8 months ago TFA literally says archaeologists discovered the crop(s) using LIDAR and GP links to a project using LIDAR to map lands.
westurner|8 months ago
FWIU in Grand Traverse Bay, Lake Michigan, there's a 9,000 year old stonehenge-like structure 40 feet underwater; that's 4000 thousand years older than Stonehenge and about 6000 years older than the Osireoin and the Pyramids.
/? Michigan underwater stonehenge: https://www.google.com/search?q=michigan+underwater+stonehen...
There's not even a name or a wikipedia page for the site? There are various presumed Clovis sites which are now underwater in TN, as well.
Antipode|8 months ago
Calling it Stonehenge-like is a real stretch.
thfuran|8 months ago
38|8 months ago
TacticalCoder|8 months ago