top | item 44283448

(no title)

Forge36 | 8 months ago

Isn't a large part of ethanol it's use as a fuel additive that it boosts octane and is relatively cheap? Compared to leaded gasoline it seems very "green".

discuss

order

Qem|8 months ago

Most crops beyond sugarcane in tropical areas lack biomass output high enough to compensate the need for fossil fuel inputs and land use emissions.

AnimalMuppet|8 months ago

Leaded gasoline hasn't been a thing for decades now.

strongpigeon|8 months ago

Except in general aviation, where lead free alternatives are just coming out of the approval pipeline.

imtringued|8 months ago

You literally proved Forge36's point. Ethanol is the replacement for lead in gasoline.

MangoToupe|8 months ago

Turning solar power into something we use to destroy the environment doesn't strike me as very "green" at all. Quite the opposite. I can't imagine it's a very efficient use of money, either.

Granted, we will likely always need to do this, but where was the need at this absurd scale? Most of our heavy industry runs on diesel anyway.

asdff|8 months ago

It goes full circle: where does the carbon in the biofuel come from? The plant. Where does the carbon in the plant come from? The air. This is why biofuels are carbon neutral in theory at least. There is of course loss in process like in most things.

In terms of a use of money it is a good way to subsidize the american corn farmer. Whether you believe that is worthwhile depends on your views of WWIII.