(no title)
testfoobar | 8 months ago
“To facilitate this vetting, all applicants for F, M and J non-immigrant visas will be asked to adjust the privacy settings on all their social media profiles to ‘public’”, the official said.
testfoobar | 8 months ago
“To facilitate this vetting, all applicants for F, M and J non-immigrant visas will be asked to adjust the privacy settings on all their social media profiles to ‘public’”, the official said.
dashundchen|8 months ago
tempodox|8 months ago
One you see that extortion works, you tighten the screws to see how much you can get out of it before it flops.
sneak|8 months ago
irjustin|8 months ago
i.e. "I don't have a social media"; "Sureeeee buddy"; "I really don't, I deleted it"; "We'll wait here until you do"
Some scary variation above.
emodendroket|8 months ago
jmye|8 months ago
(Sorry, I mean this to read as a question, not an assertion.)
unknown|8 months ago
[deleted]
Viliam1234|8 months ago
vFunct|8 months ago
Mountain_Skies|8 months ago
This isn't theoretical. Both China and India, the two countries that supply the most students to the US, prohibit marriage equality. Both have extensive discrimination throughout their societies, both at the government and cultural levels.
UncleMeat|8 months ago
kennywinker|8 months ago
unknown|8 months ago
[deleted]
sundaeofshock|8 months ago
Of course, your scenario is a big ol’ straw person, as those beliefs are not what they are screening for.
bigyabai|8 months ago
Here in America, you can't put someone on trial for a crime they haven't committed. Even if you think they're from a suspicious country. That's called racial profiling, and it's forbidden by civil rights laws for a reason; nobody should have to tolerate the indignation of their peer's stupidity.
voidUpdate|8 months ago
digianarchist|8 months ago
frollogaston|8 months ago