(no title)
CreepGin | 8 months ago
There were so many contradictions in the article, I was going to point them out. Don't see a point now.
CreepGin | 8 months ago
There were so many contradictions in the article, I was going to point them out. Don't see a point now.
eadmund|8 months ago
… means absolutely nothing. I’ve been heavily using them for decades at this point.
The article itself may or may not be AI-generated, but we cannot penalise folks for simply using a stylish bit of punctuation.
serial_dev|8 months ago
Sophira|8 months ago
I was focusing more on what you called "among other things". The way that the article uses English is extremely characteristic of, say, ChatGPT.
Veen|8 months ago
I don't believe this article is largely AI-generated. It reads to me like the work of every marketer who has learned a list of "best practices" and sticks to them rigorously. It's probably also been edited so it aligns with Grammarly's or Hemingway's view of good writing.
Plus, some people seem to think that any polished, professional writing is LLM-ish because that's the style LLMs often imitate (badly).
CreepGin|8 months ago
> It reads to me like typical marketing writing.
hmm maybe that's why it rubbed me the wrong way.
kitten_mittens_|8 months ago
tallytarik|8 months ago
ale42|8 months ago
unknown|8 months ago
[deleted]
ale42|8 months ago
CreepGin|8 months ago
Even when they are not a telltale-sign, folks are afraid of using them now because of AI. I'm not saying em dashes are bad. Our books are littered with them, and that's why LLMs spit them out consistently.
https://medium.com/@brentcsutoras/the-em-dash-dilemma-how-a-...
nchmy|8 months ago