top | item 44341985

(no title)

archsurface | 8 months ago

Facilities deep in a mountain, no IAEA access, refusal to negotiate, October 7th, ... You'd have to be quite naive to think it's all above board. (Instead of under a mountain).

discuss

order

awongh|8 months ago

Let's be clear Iran is the bad guy. But so was Saddam Hussein and he didn't have the weapons they said he did.

On Fox News they'll tell you nuclear war is imminent but they say that because they want to bomb, not because it's true or not. They're only justifying their actions, not reacting to a threat.

archsurface|8 months ago

I don't watch Fox News. Blair and Bush lying about Iraq, doesn't mean Iran isn't working towards weapons. I'm all for prosecuting Blair and Bush, always have been. This is not a matter in which you can just sit back and say "well, hopefully it's all innocent". Iran had to be open - they were the opposite.

anonnon|8 months ago

The alternatives were that they were enriching well beyond peaceful thresholds primarily for leverage in negotiations, or that they wanted "breakout" capability, so they could build multiple bombs quickly, if they ever chose to. But these alternatives can still be unacceptable from the standpoint of arms control and nuclear nonproliferation.

awongh|8 months ago

There are some ridiculous pro-palestine/anti-israel takes out there that says that the politics of the region are more stable when Iran has nuclear weapons.

megous|8 months ago

How'd any of that be a problem, even if it was true?

sundaeofshock|8 months ago

I can understand the Iranian reluctance to negotiate with the US. Trump has demonstrated that he is particularly honorable.

archsurface|8 months ago

That would be pointlessly defeatist. Also, other parties are involved to bear witness.