[erkt]

ICE must cast a wide net in blue cities because they are not sharing data on the criminal undocumented residents. They are shielding the illegal migrants who are already in jail or released on bond. Red areas are not shielding their criminal element and there is less need for such a wide net. Sanctuary cities ignoring the constitution and delegation of powers to do whatever they want is causing much of the escalation.

[righthand]

You will love this amendment (14th) from the US Constitution then, it’s a banger with it’s opening text that describes how states are responsible for protecting the people in their borders and giving them due process, citizen or not:

> All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

You know because it’s hard to make a case about being a country of rights, due process, law and order if you don’t extend that to the people within it’s borders.

The blue cities are enforcing the Constitution as sanctuary cities are legal laws of those states. The red states and federal government are violating it.

[nickff]

>” The blue cities are enforcing the Constitution as sanctuary cities are legal laws of those states. The red states and federal government are violating it.”

There’s a supremacy clause, and it’s quite clear.

[dreghgh]

Can you clarify which part of the constitution is being ignored here?

[platevoltage]

Glad to see this downvoted into oblivion until it’s barely readable. It’s like I’m reading the ramblings of one of Jesse Watter’s writers.