top | item 44430857 (no title) PeeMcGee | 8 months ago > That does not mean there isn't an AI system that can do X.You are holding the burden of proof here... discuss order hn newest amelius|8 months ago No, Carmack holds the burden of proof because he started the argument. His incapable program does not prove anything.Maybe this is formulated a bit harshly, but let us respect the logic here. jeffreygoesto|8 months ago One of my supervisors used to say: "Don't tell me it's impossible, tell me _you_ could not do it." A true c_nt move that ends every discussion. amelius|8 months ago Huh, by saying that something is impossible, __you__ are ending the discussion, not your professor. lucumo|8 months ago No. Pointing out a flaw in an argument doesn't require proving the opposite.
amelius|8 months ago No, Carmack holds the burden of proof because he started the argument. His incapable program does not prove anything.Maybe this is formulated a bit harshly, but let us respect the logic here.
jeffreygoesto|8 months ago One of my supervisors used to say: "Don't tell me it's impossible, tell me _you_ could not do it." A true c_nt move that ends every discussion. amelius|8 months ago Huh, by saying that something is impossible, __you__ are ending the discussion, not your professor.
amelius|8 months ago Huh, by saying that something is impossible, __you__ are ending the discussion, not your professor.
amelius|8 months ago
Maybe this is formulated a bit harshly, but let us respect the logic here.
jeffreygoesto|8 months ago
amelius|8 months ago
lucumo|8 months ago