top | item 44448723

(no title)

tigereyeTO | 8 months ago

Interesting. There’s a hypothesis that Earth was struck by an impact 12,800 years ago in North America but the impact site wasn’t identified

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Younger_Dryas_impact_hypothe...

Could these be related?

discuss

order

8bitsrule|8 months ago

The evidence for multiple strikes around 12,800BP has been piling up for quite a few years now. There are other theories of course. A few papers :

Alaska - https://dx.doi.org/10.1086/695703

South Carolina - www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-51552-8 (plus Article: https://theconversation.com/new-evidence-that-an-extraterres... )

Chile - https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-38089-y

South Africa - https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2014.06.017

Syria - https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-60867-w

California, Channel Islands - https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2008.09.006

deepdarkforest|8 months ago

If you actually click on the link, it mentions this both in the abstract, and a detailed comparison of evidence in a whole table.

qualeed|8 months ago

I hadn't heard of this, but it says:

>The hypothesis is widely rejected by relevant experts.[2][1][3][4] It is influenced by creationism [...] It is an alternative to the long-standing and widely accepted explanation that the Younger Dryas was caused by a significant reduction in, or shutdown of the North Atlantic Conveyor due to a sudden influx of freshwater from Lake Agassiz and deglaciation in North America. [...] Authors have not yet responded to requests for clarification and have never made their raw data available

Is there a reason why the widely accepted explanation isn't satisfactory?

tigereyeTO|8 months ago

The publication of this research.

One possibility discussed in the publication is that the sudden influx of freshwater from Lake Agassiz was caused by the Perkins Louisiana impact.