I really miss the time before generative images and video were a thing. We opened such a can of worms. Really seems like a "the scientists were so occupied with if they could they didn't stop to think if they should" situation. What is the actual utility of these tools again beyond putting artists out of work?
Waterluvian|8 months ago
SchemaLoad|8 months ago
currymj|8 months ago
if you want to use ML to do anything at all with image and video, you will usually wind up creating the capability to generate image and video one way or another.
however building a polished consumer product is a choice, and probably a mistake. every technology has good and bad uses, but there seem to be few and trivial good uses for image/video generation, with many severe bad uses.
deadbabe|8 months ago
In our case, it’s just generative AI.
mopenstein|8 months ago
bashinator|8 months ago
123yawaworht456|8 months ago
[deleted]
const_cast|8 months ago
In all seriousness, nobody is concerned about capability. Everything was always capable if you're rich enough and you have enough time. But scale matters. That's why the printing press literally created new religions.
mslansn|8 months ago