top | item 44452681

(no title)

ghufran_syed | 8 months ago

why would this be the case? Taking the 2nd amendment argument to its logical conclusion, wouldn't the speaker also have a firearm?

discuss

order

johnnyanmac|8 months ago

The logical conclusion, yes. I hope we don't need to get to that point.

The current reality is that the people who say this often say it to those they know don't have guns themselves to fire back with. Bullies, to put it in the simplest terms. They only take easy targets.

rgblambda|8 months ago

The speaker would need to sleep every night with a gun under their pillow, in a room with no window.

easyThrowaway|8 months ago

In a game-theory-prisoner-dilemma kind of situation, yeah, maybe. In the real world, those guys were always sure to point their to guns to those they knew very obviously couldn't retaliate back. And I'm not strictly talking about minorities, by the way. Simply, those who weren't part of their circle had a rough time and the police made very clear that they would act in their defense if anyone tried something funny.

I've only seen shit like this in sicily in the early 90s, when the mob controlled much of the big cities.

ethbr1|8 months ago

This is how you get revolutionary militant resistance like the Black Panthers (and militias).