top | item 44477832

(no title)

csnover | 7 months ago

In my case it was a last-ditch effort to get them to explain what was keeping them from making raid actually safe. Others have offered more concrete support more recently[0], I guess you could try reaching out to them, though I suppose they are interested in funding btrfs because they are using btrfs.

I share the sentiments of others in this discussion that I hope you are able to resolve the process issues so that bcachefs does become a viable long-term filesystem. There likely won’t be any funding from anyone ever if it looks like it’s going to get the boot. btrfs also has substantial project management issues (take a look at the graveyard of untriaged bug reports on kernel.org as one more example[1]), they just manage to keep theirs under the radar.

[0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CAEFpDz+R3rLW8iujSd2m4jH...

[1] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=__open__&...

discuss

order

koverstreet|7 months ago

Well, bcachefs has the safe, high performance problem solved.

But I really just don't know what to do if technology has become a popularity contest instead of about the technology :)