Cool technology, but what is the usecase? I can imagine traveling abroad without a sim and using it as described. But is it any better than using the cellular network (when you have access to it)?
I possibly live more remote than you do - but mobile data isn't really a thing (in the UK at least) you can rely on continuously when you're cycling, or visiting the supermarket and you've lost your partner near the cheese aisle...
I've still got dead zones near me. If I were cycling with someone, and we wanted to chat on headsets, there's at least a few places I might ride where we'd hit dead air. If we're on different networks, then we both need coverage to communicate with cellular.
Might be more reasonable to use higher bandwidth, lower latency codecs over bluetooth as well?
Cardo uses a similar tech for a dynamic mesh network, using Bluetooth I think, in their helmet comms. So if you are out on motorcycles or ATVs you can still talk without needing a cellular network. It makes things a lot more stable and not use any data. In these scenarios you'd struggle to talk face to face wearing helmets without some sort of comm.
So if you can remove the need to buy a specialized comm device to do it, sounds great.
You can't. Smartphones are Class 2 devices (weak), and you must use radio the way firmware let's you.
Purpose-built hardware is Class 1 (much stronger, 100 mW/20dBm vs 2.4mW/4dBm), and they can use sophisticated protocols to keep the connection stable. And that's Bluetooth.
If they're not playing Bluetooth but go general ISM, they can emit whole 1W on 2.4GHz or 915 MHz.
I commonly Signal call my partner when we are at opposite ends of the house. I can see something like this being useful to prevent using some remote Internet server to facilitate a very local call.
I wonder if there's a home lab / self hosted solution for this.
When I last had a university workshop where 20 people in a room worked on a bluetooth protocol I also noticed bluetooth is quickly saturated with many participants. Hopefully that changed in the last 15 years since...
sardine5|7 months ago
IshKebab|7 months ago
toast0|7 months ago
Might be more reasonable to use higher bandwidth, lower latency codecs over bluetooth as well?
jappgar|7 months ago
kaiken1987|7 months ago
subscribed|7 months ago
Purpose-built hardware is Class 1 (much stronger, 100 mW/20dBm vs 2.4mW/4dBm), and they can use sophisticated protocols to keep the connection stable. And that's Bluetooth.
If they're not playing Bluetooth but go general ISM, they can emit whole 1W on 2.4GHz or 915 MHz.
They're not really alike.
dfc|7 months ago
subscribed|7 months ago
For one rider to one rider you can get a very decent set well under $100 (Lexin b4fm, FredConn, even Thokwok is well reviewed).
nullify88|7 months ago
I wonder if there's a home lab / self hosted solution for this.
subscribed|7 months ago
I don't think so.
wickedsight|7 months ago
Also, I could see it as a useful tool in emergency situations. But a lot of people would need to use it to be actually useful.
master-lincoln|7 months ago