top | item 44493147

(no title)

Cort3z | 7 months ago

As far as i understand, this is not +-300ms. It is 300ms vs. 10 sec or something. That is a huge difference. I personally find the time to wait for these larger models a limiting factor. It’s also probably a resource waste for fairly simple task like this. (Compared to the general function approximation of the llms)

But I honestly feel like the task of smartly applying edits falls somewhat within traditional coding tasks. What about it is so difficult it could not be done with a smart diffing algorithm?

discuss

order

bhaktatejas922|7 months ago

it's a bit unclear why a model works best here. in short - smart diffing is edge case hell and you'll never capture all of them

deepdarkforest|7 months ago

you misunderstood. its 300ms just for the apply model, the model that takes your coding models output (eg sonnet) and figures out where the code should be changed in the file. Cursor has its own, and claude uses a different technique with strings as well. So its 10sec vs 10sec +300ms using your analogy

Cort3z|7 months ago

Their selling point is to be a more open version of what cursor has. So the alternative is to use a full llm. So it is 10s+ 10s vs 10s+ 300ms