Max here, author of FOKS. I find it interesting how much glue is required to perform basic cryptographic operations, even in 2025. Imagine a very simple idea like encrypting a secret with a YubiKey. If it's an important secret, that you really don't want to lose, then now you need a second YubiKey as a backup, in case the primary is lost or breaks. But now how do you encrypt and how do you rotate the primary out if needed? To the best of my understanding, there aren't great solutions short of a system like FOKS. If not FOKS, I really believe a system like it ought to exist, and it ought to be entirely open, so that arbitrary applications can be built on top of it without paying rent.
dannyobrien|7 months ago
maxtaco|7 months ago
kreetx|7 months ago
frytaped|7 months ago
jazzyjackson|7 months ago
https://keri.one/
rapnie|7 months ago
https://medium.com/finema/the-hitchhikers-guide-to-keri-part...
dpifke|7 months ago
I sign all of my Git commits, as well as Debian packages. I occasionally sign and encrypt email. My most important encryption use case is file backups, which are encrypted to my public key and copied offsite.
I'm excited about FOKS if it can serve as a modern alternative to the above, with fewer footguns that GnuPG.
vkaku|7 months ago
P.S. I built this for Group Encryption a few years ago, to help circulate key hives offline https://github.com/guilt/groupenc
pmw|7 months ago
oooyay|7 months ago
I'm actually working on a crytpography based project inspired by Keybase's use of Merkle Trees and identity proofing but with an added dash of privacy through pseudonyms and chain hashing. Thanks for putting time into this.
maxtaco|7 months ago
eterps|7 months ago
What features from a user perspective does it currently have in common with Keybase?
F.e. I remember Keybase mostly for secure messaging using public identities (HN, Reddit etc.), and sharing data/files.
maxtaco|7 months ago
unknown|7 months ago
[deleted]
xtajv|7 months ago
unknown|7 months ago
[deleted]