top | item 44506408 (no title) bjelkeman-again | 7 months ago Looks very interesting. How much work would it be to get this code signed for the Mac? discuss order hn newest notpushkin|7 months ago Not much, but you might want to donate to help the author offset the Apple Developer account cost :^) cybertimom|7 months ago I think it's pretty simple. I'm just focused on the core features right now but I definitely plan to sign it in the next 1-2 weeks. Thanks :) 999900000999|7 months ago I wouldn't make the Apple Developer dance a priority unless you intend to sell a commercial signed version.Few reasons.1. It's 100$ a year, which isn't pocket change when it's making you no revenue.2. Apple likes to randomly deny developer accounts.3. They have no issue with outright rejecting apps with vague reasoning.4. Plenty of high quality raw editing apps already exist for OSX.If someone really wants to use it on OSX you've provided clear instructions. load replies (1)
notpushkin|7 months ago Not much, but you might want to donate to help the author offset the Apple Developer account cost :^)
cybertimom|7 months ago I think it's pretty simple. I'm just focused on the core features right now but I definitely plan to sign it in the next 1-2 weeks. Thanks :) 999900000999|7 months ago I wouldn't make the Apple Developer dance a priority unless you intend to sell a commercial signed version.Few reasons.1. It's 100$ a year, which isn't pocket change when it's making you no revenue.2. Apple likes to randomly deny developer accounts.3. They have no issue with outright rejecting apps with vague reasoning.4. Plenty of high quality raw editing apps already exist for OSX.If someone really wants to use it on OSX you've provided clear instructions. load replies (1)
999900000999|7 months ago I wouldn't make the Apple Developer dance a priority unless you intend to sell a commercial signed version.Few reasons.1. It's 100$ a year, which isn't pocket change when it's making you no revenue.2. Apple likes to randomly deny developer accounts.3. They have no issue with outright rejecting apps with vague reasoning.4. Plenty of high quality raw editing apps already exist for OSX.If someone really wants to use it on OSX you've provided clear instructions. load replies (1)
notpushkin|7 months ago
cybertimom|7 months ago
999900000999|7 months ago
Few reasons.
1. It's 100$ a year, which isn't pocket change when it's making you no revenue.
2. Apple likes to randomly deny developer accounts.
3. They have no issue with outright rejecting apps with vague reasoning.
4. Plenty of high quality raw editing apps already exist for OSX.
If someone really wants to use it on OSX you've provided clear instructions.