top | item 44527867 (no title) Savageman | 7 months ago I didn't read the article yet. Does anyone know if it's better than the Google one here? [https://developers.google.com/tech-writing/overview] discuss order hn newest PandaRider|7 months ago TLDR: which is better? it dependsRedHat's style guide is far more detailed and closer to a reference/explanation (i.e. going by Diátaxis definition).Google's technical writing is shorter and closer to tutorial/how-to guide.I recommend the Google's technical writing if you're a coder or a beginner. RedHat is for folks who already know they need this on first look. Savageman|7 months ago Ok I phrased it badly with "better", I wanted to know how they compare.Your answer is perfect, thank you!
PandaRider|7 months ago TLDR: which is better? it dependsRedHat's style guide is far more detailed and closer to a reference/explanation (i.e. going by Diátaxis definition).Google's technical writing is shorter and closer to tutorial/how-to guide.I recommend the Google's technical writing if you're a coder or a beginner. RedHat is for folks who already know they need this on first look. Savageman|7 months ago Ok I phrased it badly with "better", I wanted to know how they compare.Your answer is perfect, thank you!
Savageman|7 months ago Ok I phrased it badly with "better", I wanted to know how they compare.Your answer is perfect, thank you!
PandaRider|7 months ago
RedHat's style guide is far more detailed and closer to a reference/explanation (i.e. going by Diátaxis definition).
Google's technical writing is shorter and closer to tutorial/how-to guide.
I recommend the Google's technical writing if you're a coder or a beginner. RedHat is for folks who already know they need this on first look.
Savageman|7 months ago
Your answer is perfect, thank you!