top | item 44529227 (no title) matheist | 7 months ago > We are also building an LLM-based ad-blocker after Chrome blocked uBlock Origin.Since it's a Chromium fork, why not re-enable uBlock Origin instead? discuss order hn newest Daedren|7 months ago Chromium will remove the Manifest V2 APIs, and none of these forks want to maintain them. Brave also chose to have their own built-in adblocker.The real question is, why not opt to fork Firefox who is doing that work for them. felarof|7 months ago +1, enabling uBlock origin could be a short term solution.But we are working on adding built-in adblockers just like Brave + enhancing it to detect more ad formats using lightweight local LLM. load replies (1)
Daedren|7 months ago Chromium will remove the Manifest V2 APIs, and none of these forks want to maintain them. Brave also chose to have their own built-in adblocker.The real question is, why not opt to fork Firefox who is doing that work for them. felarof|7 months ago +1, enabling uBlock origin could be a short term solution.But we are working on adding built-in adblockers just like Brave + enhancing it to detect more ad formats using lightweight local LLM. load replies (1)
felarof|7 months ago +1, enabling uBlock origin could be a short term solution.But we are working on adding built-in adblockers just like Brave + enhancing it to detect more ad formats using lightweight local LLM. load replies (1)
Daedren|7 months ago
The real question is, why not opt to fork Firefox who is doing that work for them.
felarof|7 months ago
But we are working on adding built-in adblockers just like Brave + enhancing it to detect more ad formats using lightweight local LLM.