This is the right answer, and more people (especially technical people like frequent HN) should be pointing this out.
"What ads? Oh you must be running Chrome" needs to be the common refrain.
Really hope this ends up being a surprising tide shift. Firefox has dipped really hard in marketshare, but there's no reason it can't start to gain again/grow steadily.
It's really too bad the Firefox tent wasn't big enough for all the alternative browsers that exist (though of course they're not scratching the surface of real usage either). I skipped the whole Arc wave and I'm glad I did -- it's a distraction from Firefox.
I left Firefox a few months ago because there was a bug in their shader cache, so a lot of stuff was laggy. I was willing to put up with until I got a 360 camera and videos were playing at like 2 fps. This was about six months ago, it’s possible that it’s been fixed, I haven’t checked.
I am using Brave right now, which seems fine. I have no idea if it actually respects privacy but they at least claim it does.
That doesn't solve the issue of ManifestV2 being removed though, Brave will have it removed at the same time as Chrome, when it's pulled from the code base
It crashes every few days for me and has since the last several major releases... enough that I can't rely on it anymore. (UG) Chromium has never crashed on me once.
But Firefox is so dependent on google (money, code) that it's absolutely impossible they won't also remove manifest v2. It will just take a little while, for appearances...
About a year ago FF said they had no current plans to remove V2 support, and if they did, they'd give at least 12 month notice. Which to me is basically language saying they absolutely will remove it at some point, otherwise they'd just say "no we'll never remove it, fuck google".
Did you look at the FAQ page they created afterwards?
'do not sell user data' is too broad legally. It's a challenge in some jurisdictions. So they removed that. But it's not because they sell the data. They do have partnerships (like they did Pocket for example). In this case, they have anonymous stats that they share with others and that, in some jurisdictions, could fall under 'selling user data'
hardwaresofton|7 months ago
"What ads? Oh you must be running Chrome" needs to be the common refrain.
Really hope this ends up being a surprising tide shift. Firefox has dipped really hard in marketshare, but there's no reason it can't start to gain again/grow steadily.
It's really too bad the Firefox tent wasn't big enough for all the alternative browsers that exist (though of course they're not scratching the surface of real usage either). I skipped the whole Arc wave and I'm glad I did -- it's a distraction from Firefox.
xaerise|7 months ago
b0ner_t0ner|7 months ago
qmmmur|7 months ago
DavideNL|7 months ago
tombert|7 months ago
I am using Brave right now, which seems fine. I have no idea if it actually respects privacy but they at least claim it does.
nar001|7 months ago
zulban|7 months ago
EasyMark|7 months ago
j45|7 months ago
Madmallard|7 months ago
Librewolf is the way to go now.
DavideNL|7 months ago
Also, it seems quite vague to me exactly who/what company/entity is behind it.
ranger_danger|7 months ago
dlcarrier|7 months ago
EasyMark|7 months ago
OptionOfT|7 months ago
Without it, browsing is unbearable. I wonder if they're not allowed to do so because of their contract with Google?
comprev|7 months ago
I use Firefox on other devices and use the sync functionality so prefer to use it where possible.
My home router (Draytek) is also configured to force any connected devices to use NextDNS too.
Definitely worth the €20 annual subscription.
[0] https://nextdns.io
DavideNL|7 months ago
cassianoleal|7 months ago
ProtoAES256|7 months ago
ranger_danger|7 months ago
paulryanrogers|7 months ago
I have had crashes with Firefox in a long time.
M95D|7 months ago
93po|7 months ago
I've moved to LibreWolf personally
slumberlust|7 months ago
In the same way we should chastise the platforms that choose to enshitify, we should praise those that hold out.
citizenpaul|7 months ago
rovr138|7 months ago
'do not sell user data' is too broad legally. It's a challenge in some jurisdictions. So they removed that. But it's not because they sell the data. They do have partnerships (like they did Pocket for example). In this case, they have anonymous stats that they share with others and that, in some jurisdictions, could fall under 'selling user data'