top | item 44544697 (no title) cjbprime | 7 months ago I don't agree with the "twice". A frequently performed manipulation like the fuel cutoff (usually performed after landing) collapses down to a single intention that is carried out by muscle memory, not two consciously selected actions. discuss order hn newest 1970-01-01|7 months ago Your opinion is valid but definitely doesn't align with any evidence. panxyh|7 months ago What a shallow, copy-paste response.His statement was about a certain, obviously real tendency in general, existence of which is reasonable to assume there is enough research about.He objected not to the unlikelihood of an accidental manipulation, but to the potential flaw in your comparison (which was at best a valid opinion). load replies (1)
1970-01-01|7 months ago Your opinion is valid but definitely doesn't align with any evidence. panxyh|7 months ago What a shallow, copy-paste response.His statement was about a certain, obviously real tendency in general, existence of which is reasonable to assume there is enough research about.He objected not to the unlikelihood of an accidental manipulation, but to the potential flaw in your comparison (which was at best a valid opinion). load replies (1)
panxyh|7 months ago What a shallow, copy-paste response.His statement was about a certain, obviously real tendency in general, existence of which is reasonable to assume there is enough research about.He objected not to the unlikelihood of an accidental manipulation, but to the potential flaw in your comparison (which was at best a valid opinion). load replies (1)
1970-01-01|7 months ago
panxyh|7 months ago
His statement was about a certain, obviously real tendency in general, existence of which is reasonable to assume there is enough research about.
He objected not to the unlikelihood of an accidental manipulation, but to the potential flaw in your comparison (which was at best a valid opinion).