(no title)
biohcacker84 | 7 months ago
Instead of making adding biochar to farm land an agricultural subsidy. A simple, extremely low risk policy, that is a local subsidy and does create international trade conflicts like other subsidies can.
And it does not affect any wilderness.
And in hot humid climates is proven to increase fertility.
Or a bit risky we could fertilize the open ocean, very significantly increase ocean life. And it has been proven that a significant percentage of fish poop sequesters carbon in the deep ocean.
Instead efforts seem to be focused on shading the sun. And new ideas using nukes....
tito|7 months ago
Iron fertilization, shading the sun, and more nukey-stuff, all worth exploring at this point.
GeoAtreides|7 months ago
Yeah, it's 'simple' until confronted with the sheer scale of it
rocqua|7 months ago
AngryData|7 months ago
tito|7 months ago
Puro methodology: https://biochar.groups.io/g/main/attachment/32853/2/Puro.ear...
The nice thing is biochar is relatively inert. It just sits there in soil, holding onto water, making space for organisms to grow, but isn't "food", so it doesn't get eaten up and turned back into carbon dioxide. So it's a win for farmers and carbon removal.
biohcacker84|7 months ago