top | item 44547923

(no title)

biohcacker84 | 7 months ago

I find it interesting ever more risky way to sequester carbon are invented.

Instead of making adding biochar to farm land an agricultural subsidy. A simple, extremely low risk policy, that is a local subsidy and does create international trade conflicts like other subsidies can.

And it does not affect any wilderness.

And in hot humid climates is proven to increase fertility.

Or a bit risky we could fertilize the open ocean, very significantly increase ocean life. And it has been proven that a significant percentage of fish poop sequesters carbon in the deep ocean.

Instead efforts seem to be focused on shading the sun. And new ideas using nukes....

discuss

order

tito|7 months ago

The potential benefit of this idea is it's very cheap. One penny per ton vs hundreds of dollars of per ton of biochar.

Iron fertilization, shading the sun, and more nukey-stuff, all worth exploring at this point.

GeoAtreides|7 months ago

Can you tell me, without looking up, how many gigatons of carbon are in the atmosphere and how many are added by humans each year?

Yeah, it's 'simple' until confronted with the sheer scale of it

rocqua|7 months ago

Does biochar remain in ground for long? How quickly does it decompose and rot?

AngryData|7 months ago

That is pretty variable I would think due to ground composition and how complete the char burn is. In my anecdotal experience, if you do a low grade charcoal that still has a decent amount of oils in it like a lot of old-school burn wood and bury it in earth or drench in water, most of it will have broken down to invisibility after just a few years or so mixed into the ground. However charcoal that I have burned in a container sealed from air ingress and using a secondary source of heat until the wood stops venting any gases and is nearly pure carbon, I still see decent size chunks of it in my garden areas over 2 decades later, and no reason to expect it to not still be there even 50+ years from now.

tito|7 months ago

The current best in class methodology for biochar aims for 100+ years. There are some folks saying there are pathways to make biochar last 1000+ years.

Puro methodology: https://biochar.groups.io/g/main/attachment/32853/2/Puro.ear...

The nice thing is biochar is relatively inert. It just sits there in soil, holding onto water, making space for organisms to grow, but isn't "food", so it doesn't get eaten up and turned back into carbon dioxide. So it's a win for farmers and carbon removal.

biohcacker84|7 months ago

7 to 10-ish years from what I recall. Which is another thing that makes it so low risk. If you stop the subsidy it goes away with a few years.