top | item 44550897 (no title) mdedetrich | 7 months ago For smaller disk setups possibly but with large enough scale ZFS ends up beating out btrfs. discuss order hn newest riku_iki|7 months ago I test on 2TB datasets. Do you have any specific pointers which would support your claim? mdedetrich|7 months ago I have 100+TB datasets and with a large enough SSD/RAM for L1/L2 arc ZFS edges out.Hell even the compression algorithm that ZFS has uses/has access to (LZ4) is faster than what btrfs uses and with enough IO that matters. load replies (1)
riku_iki|7 months ago I test on 2TB datasets. Do you have any specific pointers which would support your claim? mdedetrich|7 months ago I have 100+TB datasets and with a large enough SSD/RAM for L1/L2 arc ZFS edges out.Hell even the compression algorithm that ZFS has uses/has access to (LZ4) is faster than what btrfs uses and with enough IO that matters. load replies (1)
mdedetrich|7 months ago I have 100+TB datasets and with a large enough SSD/RAM for L1/L2 arc ZFS edges out.Hell even the compression algorithm that ZFS has uses/has access to (LZ4) is faster than what btrfs uses and with enough IO that matters. load replies (1)
riku_iki|7 months ago
mdedetrich|7 months ago
Hell even the compression algorithm that ZFS has uses/has access to (LZ4) is faster than what btrfs uses and with enough IO that matters.