(no title)
mattashii | 7 months ago
And note that you may be able to "fish" for samples from an atmospheric floating platform; there is no specific need to get all the way down to the rocks with your rocket.
mattashii | 7 months ago
And note that you may be able to "fish" for samples from an atmospheric floating platform; there is no specific need to get all the way down to the rocks with your rocket.
arp242|7 months ago
The first from the top of my head would be the required length and sheer weight of the cable attached to that Teflon balloon, to say nothing of the weight of the balloon itself or its contents. Speaking of which, actually keeping the contents in that balloon might also be surprisingly tricky.
You need to drag that all the way to Venus, then decelerate enough to stop all that mass, then accelerate that again to come back to Earth, before decelerating to land here. Even without any extra weight that's actually a huge challenge due to the amount of fuel required. There's a reason none of the Mars rovers have come back.
pavel_lishin|7 months ago
Not to say it'd be easy, but certainly easier than landing & returning.
pavel_lishin|7 months ago
That never even occurred to me! That's a brilliant idea.
IgorPartola|7 months ago
TeMPOraL|7 months ago