top | item 44562337 (no title) option | 7 months ago [flagged] discuss order hn newest ceejayoz|7 months ago The people of California desired a license plate reader system for certain purposes, but not others. The Tenth Amendment permits them to do so. barbazoo|7 months ago RBAC for example. Not everyone has and should have the same kind of access. Even at my dayjob I can imagine use cases where it would be inappropriate to provide certain data even to some coworker internally. mulmen|7 months ago This is a Chesterton’s fence situation. If you can’t identify the problem that this law solves then you aren’t qualified to remove it.The law exists for a reason, I encourage you to imagine what that might be. aaomidi|7 months ago Because that’s not their jurisdiction and are not allowed by the people who pay their salary?
ceejayoz|7 months ago The people of California desired a license plate reader system for certain purposes, but not others. The Tenth Amendment permits them to do so.
barbazoo|7 months ago RBAC for example. Not everyone has and should have the same kind of access. Even at my dayjob I can imagine use cases where it would be inappropriate to provide certain data even to some coworker internally.
mulmen|7 months ago This is a Chesterton’s fence situation. If you can’t identify the problem that this law solves then you aren’t qualified to remove it.The law exists for a reason, I encourage you to imagine what that might be.
aaomidi|7 months ago Because that’s not their jurisdiction and are not allowed by the people who pay their salary?
ceejayoz|7 months ago
barbazoo|7 months ago
mulmen|7 months ago
The law exists for a reason, I encourage you to imagine what that might be.
aaomidi|7 months ago