[MithrilTuxedo]

Well, their standards haven't been lowered. They have been raised to your dissatisfaction, and this article still made it through.

>I will seek my answers to the universe elsewhere.

You'll have to look elsewhere for articles that pose a threat to disadvantaged groups.

[wonderwonder]

Friend you misinterpret my point. I don't care that they post articles about disadvantaged groups or from particular view points. My concern is that when you openly state that you will decline valid scientific studies that may contradict other studies you publish then you are sacrificing your credibility as a journal. How can we trust science when one of its gateways actively states they will silence valid science for ideological reasons. You cannot. That is why I will not trust this journal. Open bias in a factual pursuit such as this is anathema.