As someone from the UK (who now lives in the US) I look forward to the reversal of roles when US techies are forced to search out proxy connections that allow them to watch online content.
It's not exactly a new phenomenon. In addition to obvious British stuff like Sherlock and The IT Crowd, I also resorted to underhanded techniques to watch the first season of the remade Battlestar Galactica series, as it was released in the UK several months before the US.
As an American living in the UK, I look forward to this as well.
ps- You can get NFL Gamepass (it's basically a web-streaming version of NFL Ticket) for $150/season if you have a UK IP address. Only problem is that it blacks out one of the games (whichever Sky sports is covering) but otherwise HD streaming video and can switch to every game live. It's a sportsman dream.
Despite all the naysaying, I have a feeling this could show up in the US sooner than expected.
HBO GO is very good, surprisingly so. The quality of that effort in combination with moves like this suggest some very smart, visionary folks are at work there.
Anecdotally, I'm seeing rapidly growing interest in cord-cutting among non-technical folks.
As tablets and 4G phones proliferate I see people in general becoming increasingly frustrated with cable and desirous of having content when and where they want it.
I only watch HBO through my Xbox and iPad (and hopefully someday my Apple TV). The experience is orders of magnitude better than dealing with Comcast's horrific set top box UI.
Wasn't the CEO of HBO doing some naysaying of his own recently? I think I remember an article where he said cord cutting was (a myth, overblown, exaggerated, ???)
Maybe he was just offering a little misdirection, but it didn't seem like it.
I imagine that their market penetration in Europe in so tiny that they can experiment with new models without pissing in too many people's Wheaties. Don't expect this in the US anytime soon.
In Slovenia (small country in Central Europe - so quite far from the HBO Nord AB countries.) they're pretty known (and available everywhere - for money of-course). And the article is wrong - we got HBO Go some months ago too.
Paying more per-show, but only paying for the shows you want to watch, will likely encourage higher quality shows.
When you have, to steal some words from Pink Floyd, "500 channels of shit on the T.V. to choose from." Then the next channel of crap will always capture marginally more money, and will be profitable if costs are low enough. So what you get is in-your face lowest common denominator crap designed to draw the attention of bored channel surfers.
On the other hand, if shows need to generate buzz around the water cooler, such that people are proud to have discovered the show and announce to the world they're paying for it, the focus needs to be on quality.
Well, this looks like something that I'd be willing to pay for once it comes to the US. Not holding my breath, but it's definitely a good sign that it's coming to other markets.
If you cannot convince some American company to stream to you (which is a matter of that company's choices, not some sort of national content embargo) then why not create your own companies and your own content? Then you also have the option of exporting that service elsewhere, which would give you a competitive advantage over companies which only serve a domestic market.
While it appears there are not that many sports fans here it is worth noting that for sport this is already happening.
The NBA and others have started online subscriptions for their content. For people in places like Australia where cable subscriptions with good sport cost $100 / month it's well worth it.
Setanta, an Irish concern, has a streaming service that allows you to pay $17 a month or $100 a year for live sport much of which is soccer. I watch the Bundesliga using this service and it is excellent.
It's a shame that you can't get Ligue 1, Serie A, La Liga and the EPL this way. Yet.
I have the MLB package. They still restrict the content to appease the cable companies, you can only watch the games that are outside of your market. Works well if you like an out of town team, but if you want to watch the local team it's worthless.
Love it. I cancelled my Directv subscription last month for Hulu + Netflix. Haven't looked back. I'd like to see ShowTime go in this direction for US customers.
I wonder when more services like this will be released in northern Europe. The legal systems are more or less identical on copyright and intellectual property, which should make it a lot easier? Combined, scandinavia covers around 20 million people and have one of the worlds highest purchasing power.
Nice one, giving it to the nordic countries first means that they can reduce the number of high-bandwidth seeders for their content on Bittorrent. At the same time profit from it.
i will cancel my TWC cable subscription in a millisecond once I can get NFL and HBO streamed to my house via my TWC internet connection. cable is so 1950s.
[+] [-] untog|13 years ago|reply
Welcome to the club.
[+] [-] marknutter|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] drstewart|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] slurgfest|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mikeash|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mmahemoff|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mbesto|13 years ago|reply
ps- You can get NFL Gamepass (it's basically a web-streaming version of NFL Ticket) for $150/season if you have a UK IP address. Only problem is that it blacks out one of the games (whichever Sky sports is covering) but otherwise HD streaming video and can switch to every game live. It's a sportsman dream.
[+] [-] _b8r0|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|13 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] ImprovedSilence|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] bgentry|13 years ago|reply
We'll see how long it takes to bring it to the US though. I'd guess that their cable co ties are too strong here to do it anytime soon.
[+] [-] jonursenbach|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] j_baker|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] 001sky|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] pavel_lishin|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] incision|13 years ago|reply
HBO GO is very good, surprisingly so. The quality of that effort in combination with moves like this suggest some very smart, visionary folks are at work there.
Anecdotally, I'm seeing rapidly growing interest in cord-cutting among non-technical folks.
As tablets and 4G phones proliferate I see people in general becoming increasingly frustrated with cable and desirous of having content when and where they want it.
[+] [-] aaronbrethorst|13 years ago|reply
I can't wait until I can switch over entirely...
[+] [-] e28eta|13 years ago|reply
Maybe he was just offering a little misdirection, but it didn't seem like it.
[+] [-] tptacek|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|13 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] jfb|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jinzo|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] gizzlon|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] stcredzero|13 years ago|reply
When you have, to steal some words from Pink Floyd, "500 channels of shit on the T.V. to choose from." Then the next channel of crap will always capture marginally more money, and will be profitable if costs are low enough. So what you get is in-your face lowest common denominator crap designed to draw the attention of bored channel surfers.
On the other hand, if shows need to generate buzz around the water cooler, such that people are proud to have discovered the show and announce to the world they're paying for it, the focus needs to be on quality.
[+] [-] danso|13 years ago|reply
http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118058484
[+] [-] anonymouz|13 years ago|reply
Oh well, back to Pirate Bay.
[+] [-] fwr|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] lambda|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] digeridoo|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] freyr|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] codesuela|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] antihero|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] baddox|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] slurgfest|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] bartonfink|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] stackingcode|13 years ago|reply
https://www.ipredator.se/ https://www.ipredator.se/page/faq#other_stream
[+] [-] sien|13 years ago|reply
The NBA and others have started online subscriptions for their content. For people in places like Australia where cable subscriptions with good sport cost $100 / month it's well worth it.
Setanta, an Irish concern, has a streaming service that allows you to pay $17 a month or $100 a year for live sport much of which is soccer. I watch the Bundesliga using this service and it is excellent.
It's a shame that you can't get Ligue 1, Serie A, La Liga and the EPL this way. Yet.
[+] [-] gtCameron|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] BryanB55|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] wmeredith|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] vegardx|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] sfall|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|13 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] JanneVee|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] tjtrapp|13 years ago|reply