[openmarkand]

I'm more of a mercurial guy (since 2009) and I honestly never understood the success of git with its total nonsense of options, UX and documentation. Each command does too much thing and has different behavior. Type git diff -x and git switch -x in a non-git repository and check the output...

I love OpenBSD and I'm really interested in got for several years. I just hope that this https://framagit.org/stsp/got/-/blob/main/got/got.c?ref_type... gets removed at some point.

[xelxebar]

9front has quite a nice implementation. It provides a unique, parsimonious UI. It's also very little code!

https://git.9front.org/plan9front/plan9front/427e868e2be75f2...

Jj is arguably also in this vein, albeit much more heavyweight.

By virtue of almost universal adoption, git as an on-disk and interchange format give us an opportunity to treat is simply as an API and experiment with new UX on top. Would love to see more of this kind of thing.

[wakawaka28]

Mercurial is slower than git. It has a few minor features that git does not have, but git has major features that Mercurial doesn't have. Git also supports interoperability with SVN out of the box, but Mercurial only has unofficial (and probably broken) plugins to do that. I used Mercurial for a few years but there is absolutely zero reason for me to go back. I would miss several lesser-known git features that I have come to rely on.

[ninjin]

> I love OpenBSD and I'm really interested in got for several years. I just hope that this https://framagit.org/stsp/got/-/blob/main/got/got.c?ref_type... gets removed at some point.

It is an OpenBSD culture reference though [1], not some sort of attempt at an insult. I would personally be sad to see it go as it does make me smile when a program is not too "corporate" and reminds me every time I see it that I have the power to pull through on my own (most of the time) if I just put my mind to it.

[1]: https://www.openbsd.org/lyrics.html#51b

[uamgeoalsk]

Why do you hope it gets removed? Personally I'd prefer to keep it - removing it would be another (small, but still) step in the corporate homogenization of everything.

[openmarkand]

I think removing a joke to be considered as corporate is a bit exaggerated.

It's okay to have "fun". I consider a software more corporate when it has a large website with dozen of MB of Javascript, analytics, XML documentation, ten automatic bots with CI checking every part of a merge request and a contributing guide larger than the whole got documentation to be more corporate than a clean and simple UX without jokes.

Remember: a clean UX should present output only when necessary. This is exactly where I prefer a lot hg status than git status for example.

[wowczarek]

That message should go. Also don't know if it's amalgamation or just because, but look ma, a single, 300k+, 14-kloc+ C source.

[uamgeoalsk]

A large C file isn't inherently wrong if it's all part of the same thing.