top | item 44578620 (no title) propter_hoc | 7 months ago > Fewer robots, more humansExactly the opposite of what they should be funding.. discuss order hn newest spauldo|7 months ago Personally, I prefer more of both. You have to actually do things - as in, develop the engineering, test things, see what works and what doesn't - to advance the state of the art. We need robots for science, humans for engineering. adastra22|7 months ago Why? IAmBroom|7 months ago IMO, because robots can replace humans in dangerous and highly undesirable jobs, while increasing overall productivity. load replies (2) blitzar|7 months ago I too welcome the rise of the terminator and its fellow machine overlords
spauldo|7 months ago Personally, I prefer more of both. You have to actually do things - as in, develop the engineering, test things, see what works and what doesn't - to advance the state of the art. We need robots for science, humans for engineering.
adastra22|7 months ago Why? IAmBroom|7 months ago IMO, because robots can replace humans in dangerous and highly undesirable jobs, while increasing overall productivity. load replies (2)
IAmBroom|7 months ago IMO, because robots can replace humans in dangerous and highly undesirable jobs, while increasing overall productivity. load replies (2)
spauldo|7 months ago
adastra22|7 months ago
IAmBroom|7 months ago
blitzar|7 months ago