top | item 44582991 (no title) okigan | 7 months ago It took 20 years to acknowledge that pushing eventual consistency to application layer is not worth it for most applications.Seems the same is playing out out in Postgres with this extension, maybe will take it another 20 years discuss order hn newest rubiquity|7 months ago The idea of active-active is too seductive compared to how hard learning distributed systems is. okigan|7 months ago It is so seductive that people don’t read the footnotes that explain that active-active does not do what they think it does. load replies (1) tinkertamper|7 months ago I'm curious about what you mean here. It sounds like you're saying that applications shouldn't concern themselves with consistency. Can you elaborate?
rubiquity|7 months ago The idea of active-active is too seductive compared to how hard learning distributed systems is. okigan|7 months ago It is so seductive that people don’t read the footnotes that explain that active-active does not do what they think it does. load replies (1)
okigan|7 months ago It is so seductive that people don’t read the footnotes that explain that active-active does not do what they think it does. load replies (1)
tinkertamper|7 months ago I'm curious about what you mean here. It sounds like you're saying that applications shouldn't concern themselves with consistency. Can you elaborate?
rubiquity|7 months ago
okigan|7 months ago
tinkertamper|7 months ago