top | item 44592956 (no title) rpcorb | 7 months ago Why don't they have a stake in the outcome anymore? discuss order hn newest rwmj|7 months ago Because they won't be around for much longer, so they won't pay many taxes compared to someone aged 16.(For the record: Devil's advocate take. I think this whole idea of voting in proportion to your monetary value is ridiculous.) jackvalentine|7 months ago (For the record, I also think this voting in proportion to your monetary value is ridiculous.)I was more thinking however that their average life expectency doesn't allow for long-term consequences of elections to affect them.
rwmj|7 months ago Because they won't be around for much longer, so they won't pay many taxes compared to someone aged 16.(For the record: Devil's advocate take. I think this whole idea of voting in proportion to your monetary value is ridiculous.) jackvalentine|7 months ago (For the record, I also think this voting in proportion to your monetary value is ridiculous.)I was more thinking however that their average life expectency doesn't allow for long-term consequences of elections to affect them.
jackvalentine|7 months ago (For the record, I also think this voting in proportion to your monetary value is ridiculous.)I was more thinking however that their average life expectency doesn't allow for long-term consequences of elections to affect them.
rwmj|7 months ago
(For the record: Devil's advocate take. I think this whole idea of voting in proportion to your monetary value is ridiculous.)
jackvalentine|7 months ago
I was more thinking however that their average life expectency doesn't allow for long-term consequences of elections to affect them.