(no title)
gitfan86 | 7 months ago
For example at one point nails were 0.5% of the economy and today owning a nail factory is a low margin business that has no social status.
Similarly the percentage of the economy and social status associated with frontend software dev will get automated and become a smaller percentage of the economy.
Since social status is a zero sum game people increase spending in other areas where social status can be helped.
visarga|7 months ago
So you believe in zero sum economy? I think new capabilities lead to demand expansion, they mobilize latent demand that was sleeping. There is no limit to desires, not even AI automation could outrun them.
gitfan86|7 months ago
Social status is zero sum and as more of the economy gets automated that becomes all that is left that is scarce
tuatoru|7 months ago
Potentially all of those, and more, become smaller employers in relative terms.
A better nail-making machine is a single-purpose technology. It's not going to affect productivity much in unrelated industries such as healthcare, for example.
AI is a general-purpose technology like electric light or electric motors. It has the potential to improve productivity in a great many productive activities.
As another person said here, even if progress in AI stopped now, we have twenty years' sustained productivity growth ahead of us in adapting processes to use AI more effectively across the whole economy.
Whether the economy as a whole grows or shrinks depends mainly on whether households will buy more entertainment, legal services, financial services, or all the rest because they are now cheaper, and to a lesser extent on whether we can discover new things that households want to buy.