top | item 44612806

(no title)

yftsui | 7 months ago

Exactly, there is no data provided on why the author believes it is “too complex”, just one random person ranting.

discuss

order

ranger_danger|7 months ago

You're not wrong, but it's funny that this same topic was posted just earlier today with a very different sentiment in the comments.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44606646

But if you dig hard enough, there's actually links to more evidence of why it is that complicated... so I don't think it was necessarily intentionally done as a method of lock-in, but where's the outrage in that? /s

"Complicated file format has legitimate reasons for being complicated" just doesn't have the same ring to it as a sensationalized accusation with no proof.

mjevans|7 months ago

Weren't those reasons effectively...?

'special case everything we ever used to do in office so everything renders exactly the same'

Instead of offering some suitable placebo for properly rendering into a new format ONCE with those specific quirks fixed in place?

dathinab|7 months ago

you can have both

having a lot of intend to keep it complicated and cause vendor locking and comply in bad faith

and this being very easy to archive just by not trying to improve on a status quo and creating a standard where you are the only one to decide what goes in where. Or other simple things like intentionally putting a senior engineer you know tends to painfully overweening things but keep it in a working state, etc. etc. Just by management decisions done in a higher level then the project you can pretty reliable mess up things in various ways as needed pretty reliable as long as you have enough people to choose from.